question

Hi, I asked this question a couple hours ago, which is still related to this current question, but my understanding has changed. Basically I threw all my player data into one object, which I wrap (seen below) for the playfab set objects request.

 var dataList = new List<SetObject>()
         {
             new SetObject()
             {
                 ObjectName = "PlayerData",
                 DataObject = CollectDataForSave() //returns a mock PlayerPayFabData object
             }
         };

My data objects are as follows:

 public class PlayerPlayFabData
 {
     public List<string> inventory;
     public List<CharacterData> allCharacterData;
 }

 public class CharacterData
 {
     public string id;
     public int level;
     public int xp;
    
     //loadout
     public List<AbilityUpgradeData> upgradeData;
     public WeaponLoadoutData weaponSlotOne;
     public WeaponLoadoutData weaponSlotTwo;
    
     //customization
     public string primaryColor; //hexadecimal
     public string secondaryColor;
     public string camoOptionId;
     public string emissionOptionId;
     public string headOptionId;
     public string chestOptionId;
     public string legsOptionsId;
     public string feetOptionId;
 }

 public class AbilityUpgradeData
 {
     public bool upgrade0; //aka ability unlocked
     public bool upgrade1;
     public bool upgrade2;
    
     public bool upgrade3a;
     public bool upgrade3b;
    
     public bool upgrade4a;
     public bool upgrade4b;
    
     public bool upgrade5a;
     public bool upgrade5b;
 }
    
 public class WeaponLoadoutData
 {
     public string weaponID;
    
     public string modOneID;
     public string modTwoID;
 }

This gives the error "Object PlayerData is 3543 bytes, the limit is 1000 bytes for title_player_account entities." Because I'm already exceeding the allocated amount of data with only three characters and three inventory items, this is apparently and obviously an inefficient method of storing data.

That said, I am unsure how to leverage the current systems to store this data in a manner that will not exceed the byte limit.

As an aside, I am very, very new to remote storage services and their associated APIs and SDKs. There is likely a very obvious solution which I am oblivious to.